If you read my first post about the Revco Reverse you saw me mention the Philip Diehl 1914 patent (US1118271A). The patent was applied for on December 12th 1912. Singer started building this machine in February of 1913 (As far as I can surmise from my interwebs researching).
About a week ago I noticed this in an ad on Craigslist. This is the best photo and there were no photos of the front of the machine.
What caught my eye in the ad wasn't the machine. It was the 18" flywheel on the treadle, sweet. For the machine I was just thinking, "meh, random industrialized version of the 15". I sent a text to the owner asking about it but didn't hear back, so it slipped off my priority list.
Over the weekend, after I finished the Revco installation I gave it another look and recognized something from the Diehl patent application. That little protrusion sticking out of the arm right there at the belt pulley. "Can't be," I thought. But I dug around for other pictures of 103s taken from the back and was convinced it was worth checking out. Plus an eighteen inch flywheel.
This morning I texted the owner with a bit more urgency in my finger tapping. Luckily she responded and the machine had not sold yet. The wife didn't have anything work related today and we had until mid afternoon before needing to be back to drop some tools off at the high school for our son's robotics club meeting, so off we went to New York! To buy a machine. Again.
Sure Enough -
We met the very nice owner, Stacey, who said that her dad had this for many years. She believed that her grandmother had it before him but does not think she was the original owner. She has had it for a while and just never had time to do the restoration work it needs.
Here's a closeup of the head, the reverse lever is to the right and goes under the Feed Regulating Thumb Screw. (I can't believe they didn't come up with a cool new name for that when they changed it out from the old 27/66 style clunky actual screw to this cool click dial.)
You can also see the level of rust on this thing. It looks like Stacey's dad lived close to the ocean.
The 103 occupies that weird space people call Semi-Industrial. It includes machines like the 1200. Basically home machines that have tricked out with knee lift presser bars and given just a base black japanning with minimal decals. The Singer description of the 103 includes: "For Home Manufacturing."
Everything that was supposed to turn on this machine was seized. Every. Single. Thing. Even the presser foot knee lift lever.
The treadle did move. Loudly. Once we got it up to the sewing room I gave the treadle a good douse with Singer oil so I could pedal it without the shrieking. Now just a little bit of squeaking. I'll take it apart when we have a warm day and get it cleaned up and polish the cone bearings.
The table top is also a mess. Almost all of the veneer is gone. I'll take a putty knife after the rest. Then we'll give it a bit of a sanding and put some 3M peel and stick on it. It looks so pitiful I'll work on it while it's too cold for me to get the boy to spend time helping dry wall.
I hosed down the entire machine with BlasterPB and let it soak for about an hour. That did a good job of loosening almost everything. The only thing still stuck is the hook.
I gave it two more coats. It's still frozen. Not the hook itself, but the Bobbin Case Holder is fused to it and it held from spinning by the Position Bracket above it. So the hook can't spin. I tried removing the bracket, but it's a pretty solid wedged in place. After it soaks overnight I'll try everything again. Luckily it uses the same hook assembly as the 95's and just about every other rotating hook industrial machine on the planet it seems, so I ordered a new one off Ebay, just in case.
It came with the original bent wood top. At first I didn't think it was the top, just one off a bent wood case that had been drafted into duty, but the table has the correct latch receptacles and the top doesn't have a handle or holes for one, so I guess it's the correct top.
The blue towels are because I shot this right before the BlasterPB hose down began.
It's hard to make out the serial number. It was completely caked over and I had to go after it with a paint sanding block for a bit to get it somewhat legible.
The "C" serial numbers are from the pre-WWII Germany plant that started production in 1904. Actually production went until 1943 but I doubt they were exporting much to the West. Since the 103 went into production in 1913 that gives a range of 1913 to 1939-ish.
Digging a bit the estimate production numbers from the plant is thought to be 6.5 million units from 1904 to 1943. If we just go linearly that would put around 167,000 (rounded up) machines a year, so 12 years to get to 2051144 . On my time scale that puts the year of this serial number in the ballpark of 1914. Very unscientific guesstimate, that.
I need to do some more verification. The List of Parts notes that the 103-1 went obsolete sometime before 1917. There were specific changes made between the 103-1 and the 103-2. If my parts turn out to be 103-1 parts then I'll be very comfortable giving my year as between 1913-1916.
(23 February edit: Miller, one of the regulars on the Treadle-On mailing list mentioned in a discussion about another machine that he had the year-by-year serial numbers for the Wittenberge factory. Turns out the 103 was made in 1921. So I was off by less than a decade. Yay. Two more years and it will be an antique.)
Oh. And just in case you forgot it has the Diehl slap lever reverse!
This machine is going to get a very full break down for cleaning. And while I do that I'm going to take on hard look at if it would be possible to fabricate the parts to upgrade my other non-reverse machines using the Diehl design.
I'd love to see that slap reverse in action. You mention potentially fabricating parts to upgrade other machines. Have you still been considering that project? I've got a Singer 66 that I really enjoy-- it sews through anything-- but constant treadling with a quick reverse lever is the best method I've ever found for patching denim. (I may eventually find a machine that has reverse already built into it, but $25 is $25 when I see a machine with the treadle table intact.)
ReplyDeleteI haven't gotten to it yet. Just keep getting caught up with other projects. I have the Revco reverse that I can try and copy at some point. I'll definitely do a video of that if I make it. Pretty sure the patent has expired by this point so I don't think there's a problem showing how to duplicate it.
DeleteWould love that. You're in my RSS reader now, so I should see it when/if you get to it :)
Deletehi, I own two similar cars. 103. At this time I want to put it in order and use it. How is your restoration going?
ReplyDeleteStill looking to replace the underside parts. It's useable but a little sloppy on stitches
DeleteHello, so I'm looking for information about this machine, I wound up with one missing the stitch length adjustment assembly (the knob and screw) but I have a friend with access to machining tools so we can make a replacement, but I was wondering if there's any chance you could get me it's dimensions?
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately I'm in Oklahoma for the foreseeable future to take care of some business dealings.
DeleteI would recommend trying victorian sweatshop. Several of the users there have 103s.
DeleteThanks for taking the time to respond regardless
DeleteHello David,
ReplyDeletecall myself an unknown artist and find myself in the sweatshop. I'm the guy from Germany who is reassembling the Wittenberge Serials. First things first - I'm a big fan of the 103D machines - they are beautifully designed and well built. The only Singer with reverse for decades ! It was around Black Friday - first worldwide financial crisis the next domestic reverse Singer was built - the 15 -88. Later the 201 and 206 Zig Zag.
the first 201D is 1932 and the first 206D is 1934
In my records, the first 201D is the C 2805*** and the first 206D is the C 2806***
Fortunately I have an invoice for a 103D with the serial number C 2042080 and it is dated March 1930.
This is how I sort your machine. The older machines have the Acantus decals.
Singer serial numbers are always assigned in advance. Larger numbers were expected for the 103. The number block from 1 million to 1.1 million is reserved for the first batch of 103Ds. Half of them have the old decals. Then there was another block of 2 million to 2.1 million - your sewing machine is also in this range.
It was built BEFORE 1933, because from April 1933 there was a clearly visible change to the sewing machines from Wittenberge. The international Singer badge was replaced by a national 'Singer Nähmaschinen Fabrik Wittenberge' badge.
Another thing: One more thing: There was a list and a rumor that about 6.5 million sewing machines were produced in Wittenberge. This is definitely not true. This rumor must now be dispelled.
I can prove on the basis of various facts that not even 4 million Singer sewing machines were built in Wittenberge.
The facts are as follows: From 1938, the brass plaque disappeared and stickers were used again instead of a brass plaque. Apparently, Wittenberge already knew in 1938 that the brass would soon be used exclusively for cartridge cases.
From 1942 there was a further change in the sticker. The Wittenberge sticker became more golden and shiny.
The last known household sewing machines were 'blackside' and class 15-88. There are over 2500 serial numbers from Wittenberge in my archive (yours is now one of them)
There is no Singer household sewing machine from Wittenberge with a serial number higher than 3.9 million
The last sewing machines were industrial sewing machines and were used to make things that were important for the war effort (boots, coats, uniforms etc.)
greetings
unknown Artist
Thanks for the info. You might also share this on Victorian Sweatshop - https://www.victoriansweatshop.com and with the folks at ISMACS - https://ismacs.net if you haven't already.
DeleteHey David, i ve already shared this in the sweathop forum annd ISMACS ... and some more ✌️
ReplyDelete